Wealth is a meaningless term without the concept of value. If we know that the purpose of human action is to satisfy one's needs and wants, then the material wealth of two different individuals (let alone abstract entities such as nations) cannot tell us much about the satisfaction of their needs and wants. Wants and needs are subjective, unknown, and immeasurable by an outside observer.
Monday, June 21, 2010
KA-POW! #35 - Rajsic
Thursday, May 20, 2010
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
KA-POW! #25 - Read
Man, on the other hand, does not now possess a like set of instinctual do-nots: built-in prohibitions. Instead, he must enjoy or suffer the consequences of his own free will, his own power to choose between what's right and what's wrong. In a word, man is more or less at the mercy of his own imperfect understanding and conscious decisions.
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Thursday, October 15, 2009
"Greenspace Press Release"
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Greenspace Commences the Liquidation of Mankind
...
[Sorry, the review period has ended.]

Friday, October 9, 2009
KA-POW! #2 - Mallick
In Human Action, Mises identifies a methodological dichotomy between the social and the natural sciences. This dichotomy is in how we use teleology and causality to explain different kinds of events.
These two terms are best explained by use of examples. When we throw a ball, for instance, we do not reason that it is guided in a teleological way by some mystical spirit or "prime mover." Instead we use the laws of mechanics and causality to examine the position, velocity, and forces acting on the ball, in order to predict the future position and velocity of the ball.


